Para istead of que

Emanuel B.C1Kwiziq Q&A regular contributor

Para istead of que

Podemos cambiar que por la preposición para? No hay alimentos para comer?

This question relates to:Spanish lesson "Spanish relative clauses using the infinitive"

Asked 2 years ago

Like3Answer1

InmaKwiziq team member

Hola Emanuel

Yes you could use "para" here; it's grammatically correct, and it's pretty much saying the same, but it won't sound as natural as using que + infinitives with the verbs haber, tener and quedar.

Saludos

Like22 years ago

Emanuel B. asked:View original

Para istead of que

Podemos cambiar que por la preposición para? No hay alimentos para comer?

Don't have an account yet? Join today

« Elección de artículo en la prueba Llevarse as opposed to llevar? »

Ask a question

Find your Spanish level for FREE

Test your Spanish to the CEFR standard

Find your Spanish level